Proprietary Framework · MNS Consulting × Lladner Business Solutions

IGRIS™
Integrated
Geo-Risk
Intelligence

Integrated Geo-Risk Intelligence System™ · Integrated Geopolitical Risk Intelligence System™

A five-phase closed-loop intelligence engine that fuses structured analytic tradecraft (SATCON-X), contextual vulnerability quantification (CARVER-ECO), and correlated probabilistic simulation (Monte Carlo / Gaussian copula) into a living decision architecture — purpose-built for corporate boards, GSOCs, and national security councils operating in volatile theaters.

SATCON-X structured analytics CARVER-ECO prioritization Monte Carlo · Gaussian copula Go / Stage-Gate / Pause thresholds Living risk intelligence engine
00
Genesis

Built as an
Operational Engine

IGRIS™ was conceived by Quanta Analytica MNS Consulting and developed in partnership with Lladner Business Solutions' Risk Management & GSOC Services Division. It emerged from over a decade of field intelligence analysis, strategic security consulting, and corporate risk governance — not as a theoretical framework, but as an operational engine built to solve real failure modes in global risk analysis.

Traditional risk matrices assume linearity and understate tail-risk events that define real crises. IGRIS was built to replace them with a system that treats uncertainty as measurable data, bias as a structural problem to be engineered out, and decision thresholds as pre-modeled before a crisis — not improvised during one.

The Four Problems IGRIS Solves

  • Static thinking — analysts treating risk as fixed, not evolving with the intelligence environment
  • Cognitive bias — over-reliance on expert intuition without structured challenge mechanisms
  • False precision — deterministic single-point forecasts that ignore the distribution of possible futures
  • Siloed data — economic, security, cyber, and reputational indicators not fused into a single model

Who IGRIS Serves

  • Corporate boards and C-suite risk principals
  • Global Security Operations Centers (GSOCs)
  • National security councils and policy intelligence units
  • Interagency task forces and joint intelligence centers
  • Institutional investors and sovereign fund risk teams
  • Humanitarian and development organizations in volatile theaters

What IGRIS Produces

  • Probabilistic country & sector risk forecasts with confidence bands
  • CARVER-weighted vulnerability scores for GSOC dashboards
  • Tripwire-based decision triggers (Go / Stage-Gate / Pause)
  • Scenario clusters with named likelihoods and narrative intelligence
  • Monte Carlo probability distributions with correlated risk events
01
System Architecture

The Closed-Loop Intelligence Cycle

Five phases · continuous reassessment
DATA COLLECTION · GCAR INPUTS · OSINT / HUMINT / SIGINT / ECONOMIC TELEMETRY PHASE 1 SATs · SATCON-X Frame & hypothesize PHASE 2 CARVER-ECO Prioritize & score PHASE 3 Monte Carlo Simulate & quantify PHASE 4 Decision Interface Thresholds & action PHASE 5 Feedback Loop Reassess & adapt CONTINUOUS FEEDBACK · NEW INTEL → RE-SCORE → RE-RUN → UPDATED POSTURE DECISION-GRADE OUTPUTS Probability curves · CARVER scores · Scenario clusters · Tripwire matrix · GSOC dashboards · Board briefs Removes bias · expands hypothesis space Objectively ranks priorities across domains Converts uncertainty into quantified intelligence Defensible, transparent strategic action Adaptive real-time situational awareness

The IGRIS cycle does not terminate. Phase 5 feeds updated intelligence back into Phase 1, making the model a living risk intelligence engine — mirroring the continuous assessment cycle used in modern Joint Intelligence Centers and corporate war rooms.

02
Five Phases

The Five Operating Layers

From framing to action to reassessment

Each phase has a defined objective, inputs, process flow, and strategic result. The phases are sequential in their first execution and continuously iterative thereafter — with Phase 5 feeding back into Phase 1 as new intelligence arrives.

1Phase I
Intelligence Framing — SATCON-X
Structured Analytic Techniques · Key Assumptions Check · ACH · Red-team challenge
Phase 1 defines the problem space without bias. Before any number is produced, SATCON-X (Structured Analytic Convergence Method) forces analysts to surface hidden assumptions, articulate competing hypotheses, and challenge the analytical baseline. This is not a box-ticking exercise — it is a structured interrogation of what the analyst believes to be true and why. The Key Assumptions Check identifies embedded biases in political, economic, and security indicators. Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) tests plausible outcomes — regime reform versus collapse, escalation versus de-escalation — against each other rather than in isolation. What-If analysis explores low-probability, high-impact shocks. The output is a validated hypothesis matrix that defines the key variables entering the quantitative model.
  • Key Assumptions Check — surface hidden biases in indicators
  • Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) — compare plausible outcomes
  • What-If / HI-LO shock analysis — map low-probability, high-impact events
  • Red-team challenge sessions — independent hypothesis stress-testing
Output: Validated hypothesis matrix · red-teamed analytic baseline
2Phase II
Risk Prioritization — CARVER-ECO
CARVER Extended Contextual Optimization · vulnerability quantification · heatmap generation
Phase 2 quantifies qualitative risks and focuses simulation resources on the variables that matter most. CARVER-ECO is an evolved version of the classic CARVER matrix — re-engineered to incorporate modern risk dimensions including Economic Exposure, Cyber Vulnerability, and Operational Recoverability alongside the traditional six dimensions (Criticality, Accessibility, Recuperability, Vulnerability, Effect, Recognizability). Each major risk or threat vector is scored 1–5 across these dimensions. Scores are dynamically weighted based on geopolitical context — in hybrid war zones, for example, cyber risk may outweigh kinetic risk and weights are adjusted accordingly. The output is a ranked risk map and CARVER heatmap that tells analysts and decision-makers exactly where to focus the simulation engine.
  • Assign CARVER-ECO scores for each threat vector (1–5 per dimension)
  • Generate CARVER heatmap — ranked assets and threats by composite score
  • Dynamic weight adjustment based on geopolitical context
  • Translate subjective analyst judgement into semi-quantitative parameters
Output: Ranked risk register · CARVER heatmap · collection priorities
3Phase III
Probabilistic Simulation — Monte Carlo / Gaussian Copula
IGRIS Core Engine · correlated Bernoulli events · 10,000+ simulated futures
Phase 3 converts uncertainty into quantified, decision-grade intelligence. The IGRIS Core Engine runs Monte Carlo simulations — typically 10,000 to 20,000 iterations — across the CARVER-ECO weighted risk variables. Critically, IGRIS does not treat risks as independent events. A Gaussian copula models the correlations between risks: a militant raid and a corridor disruption are correlated because they share common drivers. Running independent simulations would systematically underestimate compound risk. The output is a full probability distribution of futures — not a single forecast — organized into scenario clusters (Most Likely, Worst-Case, Best-Case) with named probability bands. The engine also generates CARVER-weighted annual severity scores that translate event occurrence into impact magnitude.
  • Define variable ranges and monthly event probabilities from CARVER-ECO
  • Model risk correlations via Gaussian copula (Cholesky decomposition)
  • Run 10,000–20,000 Monte Carlo iterations across correlated Bernoulli events
  • Cluster output into scenario likelihoods with named narrative descriptions
  • Generate CARVER-weighted severity score distribution per trial
Output: Probability curves · scenario clusters · CARVER severity scores
4Phase IV
Strategic Decision Interface
Go / Stage-Gate / Pause thresholds · visualization dashboards · board-level communications
Phase 4 translates probabilistic analytics into actionable decisions. The simulation output is rendered as a visualization dashboard — probability distribution graphs for key risks, geo-mapped CARVER threat overlays, and scenario count summaries. Decision Threshold Mapping defines the measurable conditions under which specific strategic actions are triggered: a Go decision if instability probability remains below a defined threshold, a Stage-Gate if it crosses an intermediate level, a Pause and Business Continuity Plan activation if it exceeds the critical level. These thresholds are pre-agreed with the risk committee before a crisis — not improvised during one. Communications templates are pre-approved for board, CFO, or national council presentation, providing data-driven justification for strategic decisions.
  • Probability distribution visualization for each priority risk
  • Geo-mapped CARVER threat overlays (red = high effect + accessibility)
  • Decision threshold mapping — Go / Stage-Gate / Pause with measurable indicators
  • Pre-approved communications templates for CFO, board, or national council
Output: Action thresholds · tripwire matrix · GSOC dashboards · board briefs
5Phase V
Continuous Feedback Loop — Dynamic Reassessment
New OSINT / HUMINT / SIGINT · re-score · re-run · back-test calibration
Phase 5 is what transforms IGRIS from a static assessment into a living intelligence engine. New intelligence — OSINT, HUMINT, SIGINT, operational telemetry including dwell times, insurance premiums, and incident rates — is ingested and evaluated against prior forecasts. CARVER-ECO weights are re-scored where the threat or mission profile has changed. Simulations are re-run with updated parameters. Deviation from prior forecasts is captured and used to back-test model calibration — measured using Brier scores or proper scoring rules. This phase mirrors the continuous assessment cycle used in modern Joint Intelligence Centers (JIC) and corporate war rooms. The model's value compounds over time as calibration improves with each cycle.
  • Ingest new OSINT / HUMINT / SIGINT and operational telemetry
  • Re-score CARVER-ECO where threat or mission profile has changed
  • Re-run Monte Carlo simulations with updated parameters
  • Capture forecast deviation and update probability curves
  • Back-test model calibration using Brier / proper scoring rules
  • Archive decisions and parameter logs for audit trail
Output: Revised forecasts · adaptive posture · calibration record
03
Parent Methodologies

The Two Founding Methods

Intelligence tradecraft + vulnerability science

IGRIS draws from three foundational QA-MNS methodologies that were field-tested across multiple regions and sectors before being fused into the closed-loop system. Two parent methods are the primary contributors — SATCON-X and CARVER-ECO — each addressing a distinct analytical failure mode.

SATCON-X Structured Analytic Convergence Method

A proprietary adaptation of Intelligence Community Structured Analytic Techniques (SATs) — including Key Assumptions Check, Analysis of Competing Hypotheses, and What-If analysis — merged with corporate red-team protocols. SATCON-X forces analysts to articulate why a risk matters and how it interacts with other risks before any quantification begins. It provides IGRIS with the hypothesis space and bias-checked variable set that feed the model. Without SATCON-X, the simulation engine operates on assumptions that have never been challenged — and garbage in produces garbage out at 10,000 iterations per run.

Key Assumptions Check ACH What-If · HI-LO Red-team sessions
CARVER-ECO CARVER Extended Contextual Optimization

An evolved version of the classic CARVER matrix — originally a military targeting tool — re-engineered to assess interdependencies across economic, political, cyber, and reputational dimensions alongside the traditional six. CARVER-ECO converts subjective analyst judgement into semi-quantitative weights, creating a structured bridge between human intelligence insight and the simulation engine. It supplies IGRIS with the weighted parameters that define what is "critical" or "vulnerable" in the Monte Carlo model. The ECO suffix reflects the expanded contextual weighting — a CARVER score in a hybrid warfare zone weights cyber and reputational exposure differently than the same score in a conventional conflict environment.

Criticality · Accessibility Recuperability · Vulnerability Effect · Recognizability + Economic · Cyber · Reputation
CapabilityMechanismStrategic Benefit
SATs IntegrationKey Assumptions Check, ACH, red-teamRemoves bias and expands hypothesis space before quantification
CARVER-ECO QuantificationSemi-quantitative 1–5 scoring + context weightsObjectively ranks priorities across national, corporate, and sectoral lines
Monte Carlo ForecastingGaussian copula · 10,000+ iterationsAdds probabilistic depth and correlation modeling to qualitative intelligence
Dynamic Feedback LoopRe-score · re-run · back-test calibrationEnables adaptive, real-time situational awareness that compounds in value
Cross-Domain FusionGeopolitical + cyber + financial risk in one modelBridges traditionally siloed intelligence domains into a single decision engine
Pre-agreed ThresholdsGo / Stage-Gate / Pause mapped to indicatorsDecisions are made by the model architecture, not improvised under pressure
04
Applied Intelligence · Africa Portfolio

Six-Country Geo-Risk Dashboard

6–12 month horizon · CARVER + Monte Carlo

The following represents IGRIS applied across six African theaters actively monitored by MNS Consulting. Each country cut runs the full five-phase IGRIS cycle — SATCON-X framing, CARVER-ECO scoring, Monte Carlo probabilistic simulation, decision thresholds, and collection priorities. These are illustrative planning probabilities derived from current intelligence baselines; they are not a substitute for a full coded model run against your organization's specific exposure profile.

DRC
Democratic Republic of the Congo
6–12 mo.
CARVER-ranked risks
Cobalt export quota tightening
62%
M23 / Rwanda–DRC escalation
48%
ADF/ISIS mass-casualty attacks
58%
Logistics corridor friction
38%
Scenario clusters
Regulated Tightness~45%
Security-Led Shock~30%
Policy Easing / Quiet~15%
Mozambique
Cabo Delgado / LNG portfolio
6–12 mo.
CARVER-ranked risks
Onshore LNG restart risk
67%
ISM raids — Mocímboa/Palma
52%
Civilian displacement surges
42%
Offshore LNG disruption
15%
Scenario clusters
Contained Instability, Offshore Momentum~45%
Shock Reversals~30%
Security gains enabling onshore~15%
Sudan
El Fasher / Darfur / SAF–RSF
6–12 mo.
CARVER-ranked risks
El Fasher siege / civilian harm
62%
Humanitarian access collapse
58%
Advanced weapons / air-op risk
43%
Oil/pipeline disruption
38%
Scenario clusters
Attritional Siege & Fragmented Access~45%
Arms-Sustained Stalemate~30%
Localized ceasefire traction~15%
Mauritania
GTA / Tasiast / Sahel border
6–12 mo.
CARVER-ranked risks
Cross-border militant spillover
32%
Migration-policing controversy
52%
GTA offshore HSE incident
15%
Tasiast industrial disruption
27%
Scenario clusters
Buffered Stability, Reputational Churn~45%
Border Shock Lite~25%
Dual industrial hits<15%
Benin
W–Pendjari / Niger corridor
6–12 mo.
CARVER-ranked risks
Complex attacks on northern posts
52%
IED / kidnap — W–Pendjari
45%
Niger corridor/pipeline shock
38%
Maritime incident — GoG
20%
Scenario clusters
Northern Grind~45%
Corridor Shock~25%
Security gains via external support~15%
Togo
Savanes / Port of Lomé
6–12 mo.
CARVER-ranked risks
Cross-border raids / IEDs (Savanes)
52%
Lomé anchorage incident
32%
Rights / political controversy
45%
Port / logistics disruption
20%
Scenario clusters
Northern Grind, Coastal Control~45%
Offshore Scare~25%
Rights Flashpoint~15%

Portfolio Bottom Line — Cross-Cutting Risk Summary

The heaviest systemic risk across the six theaters is DRC's cobalt quota regime — a global supply chain impact that extends far beyond the country's borders. The most acute humanitarian and security emergencies are Sudan (Darfur) and northern Benin and Togo. Mozambique's offshore gas trajectory is positive but onshore remains security-conditioned. Mauritania maintains comparative stability with risk concentrated in border spillover and ESG optics around migration controls.

DRC — Policy High MOZ — Offshore High / Onshore Security-Conditional Sudan — Attritional Violence High Mauritania — Stable, Alert Posture Benin — Northern Grind Medium-High Togo — Savanes Medium, Lomé Alert
05
Monte Carlo Engine

The Simulation Engine

Python · Gaussian copula · correlated Bernoulli events

The IGRIS Monte Carlo engine models correlated risk events using a Gaussian copula — ensuring that related risks move together realistically rather than as independent coin flips. The Benin example below demonstrates the engine with illustrative monthly probabilities. Replace the risk configuration and correlation matrix with your country-specific parameters to run a live IGRIS assessment.

Step 1 — Define Probabilities

Set a monthly event probability for each risk (e.g., 0.20 = 20% chance per month) derived from your CARVER-ECO scoring and intelligence baseline.

Step 2 — Set Correlations

Build a correlation matrix capturing how risks co-move (e.g., militant raids and corridor shocks share causal drivers — a correlation of 0.35 models that relationship).

Step 3 — Run & Interpret

Run run_igris_monte_carlo() for scenario probabilities. Add CARVER weights via carver_weighted_scores() for annual severity distribution.

Python 3 · NumPy · Pandas IGRIS Monte Carlo Engine — Gaussian Copula for Correlated Bernoulli Events
# IGRIS Monte Carlo Engine (Gaussian Copula for Correlated Bernoulli Events)
# M. Nuri Shakoor, SRMP — Quanta Analytica MNS Consulting
# In partnership with Lladner Business Solutions, Risk Management & GSOC Services Division

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

def gaussian_copula_bernoulli(P, corr, trials=10000, months=12, seed=42):
    """Generate correlated Bernoulli outcomes over months for multiple risk factors.
    P     : (k,) array of monthly event probabilities
    corr  : (k,k) PSD correlation matrix between factors
    Returns: (trials, months, k) boolean array"""
    rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
    P = np.asarray(P, dtype=float)
    k = P.shape[0]
    corr = np.asarray(corr, dtype=float)
    eps = 1e-10
    try:
        L = np.linalg.cholesky(corr)
    except np.linalg.LinAlgError:
        L = np.linalg.cholesky(corr + np.eye(k) * eps)

    def norm_ppf(u):  # Acklam inverse normal CDF (no scipy dependency)
        u = np.asarray(u)
        a = [-3.969683028665376e+01, 2.209460984245205e+02, -2.759285104469687e+02,
              1.383577518672690e+02, -3.066479806614716e+01, 2.506628277459239e+00]
        b = [-5.447609879822406e+01, 1.615858368580409e+02, -1.556989798598866e+02,
              6.680131188771972e+01, -1.328068155288572e+01]
        c = [-7.784894002430293e-03, -3.223964580411365e-01, -2.400758277161838e+00,
             -2.549732539343734e+00, 4.374664141464968e+00, 2.938163982698783e+00]
        d = [7.784695709041462e-03, 3.224671290700398e-01, 2.445134137142996e+00,
             3.754408661907416e+00]
        plow, phigh = 0.02425, 1 - 0.02425
        x = np.empty_like(u, dtype=float)
        mask = u < plow
        q = np.sqrt(-2*np.log(u[mask]))
        x[mask] = (((((c[0]*q+c[1])*q+c[2])*q+c[3])*q+c[4])*q+c[5]) / \
                  ((((d[0]*q+d[1])*q+d[2])*q+d[3])*q+1)
        mask = u > phigh
        q = np.sqrt(-2*np.log(1-u[mask]))
        x[mask] = -(((((c[0]*q+c[1])*q+c[2])*q+c[3])*q+c[4])*q+c[5]) / \
                   ((((d[0]*q+d[1])*q+d[2])*q+d[3])*q+1)
        mask = (u >= plow) & (u <= phigh)
        q = u[mask] - 0.5
        r = q*q
        x[mask] = (((((a[0]*r+a[1])*r+a[2])*r+a[3])*r+a[4])*r+a[5]) * q / \
                  (((((b[0]*r+b[1])*r+b[2])*r+b[3])*r+b[4])*r+1)
        return x

    thresholds = norm_ppf(P)
    outcomes = np.zeros((trials, months, k), dtype=bool)
    for t in range(trials):
        Z = rng.standard_normal(size=(months, k))
        Y = Z @ L.T
        outcomes[t] = (Y < thresholds)
    return outcomes

def run_igris_monte_carlo(risk_config, corr, months=12, trials=10000, seed=42):
    """risk_config: {risk_name: monthly_probability}
    Returns: (summary_dict, details_df, outcomes)"""
    risk_names = list(risk_config.keys())
    probs = np.array([risk_config[r] for r in risk_names], dtype=float)
    outcomes = gaussian_copula_bernoulli(probs, corr, trials=trials, months=months, seed=seed)
    tags = []
    for rn in risk_names:
        l = rn.lower()
        if any(x in l for x in ["raid","ied","attack","insurg","militant"]): tags.append("SECURITY")
        elif any(x in l for x in ["maritime","anchorage","piracy","offshore"]): tags.append("MARITIME")
        elif any(x in l for x in ["policy","quota","rights","corridor","pipeline"]): tags.append("POLICY")
        else: tags.append("OTHER")
    tags = np.array(tags)
    trial_flags = {"SECURITY_SHOCK":[], "POLICY_SHOCK":[], "MARITIME_SHOCK":[]}
    for t in range(outcomes.shape[0]):
        tr = outcomes[t]
        sec_m = tr[:,tags=="SECURITY"].any(axis=1).sum() if np.any(tags=="SECURITY") else 0
        pol_m = tr[:,tags=="POLICY"].any(axis=1).sum() if np.any(tags=="POLICY") else 0
        mar_m = tr[:,tags=="MARITIME"].any(axis=1).sum() if np.any(tags=="MARITIME") else 0
        trial_flags["SECURITY_SHOCK"].append(sec_m >= 2)
        trial_flags["POLICY_SHOCK"].append(pol_m >= 1)
        trial_flags["MARITIME_SHOCK"].append(mar_m >= 1)
    trial_flags = {k: np.array(v) for k,v in trial_flags.items()}
    dual    = trial_flags["SECURITY_SHOCK"] & trial_flags["POLICY_SHOCK"]
    sec_only = trial_flags["SECURITY_SHOCK"] & ~trial_flags["POLICY_SHOCK"]
    pol_only = ~trial_flags["SECURITY_SHOCK"] & trial_flags["POLICY_SHOCK"]
    quiet   = ~trial_flags["SECURITY_SHOCK"] & ~trial_flags["POLICY_SHOCK"]
    summary = {"p_dual_shock": dual.mean(), "p_security_only": sec_only.mean(),
               "p_policy_only": pol_only.mean(), "p_quiet": quiet.mean(),
               "p_any_maritime": trial_flags["MARITIME_SHOCK"].mean()}
    details = pd.DataFrame({"risk": risk_names,
                            "monthly_prob": [risk_config[r] for r in risk_names],
                            "tag": tags})
    return summary, details, outcomes

def carver_weighted_scores(outcomes, carver_weights, risk_names):
    """Compute CARVER-weighted annual severity score per trial.
    carver_weights: {risk_name: {C,A,R,V,E,Rz}} — returns 1D array per trial"""
    occurred = outcomes.any(axis=1)
    weights = np.array([sum(carver_weights[rn].values()) for rn in risk_names], dtype=float)
    return (occurred * weights).sum(axis=1)

# ---- Example: Benin (replace with your country parameters) ----
benin_config = {
    "northern_complex_attack": 0.20,
    "IED_or_kidnap_event":     0.15,
    "corridor_pipeline_shock": 0.10,
    "maritime_anchor_incident":0.03,
    "rights_or_local_unrest":  0.08
}
risk_names = list(benin_config.keys())
k = len(risk_names)
corr = np.eye(k)
def idx(name): return risk_names.index(name)
corr[idx("northern_complex_attack"), idx("IED_or_kidnap_event")]    = 0.35
corr[idx("IED_or_kidnap_event"),     idx("northern_complex_attack")] = 0.35
corr[idx("northern_complex_attack"), idx("corridor_pipeline_shock")] = 0.20
corr[idx("rights_or_local_unrest"),  idx("corridor_pipeline_shock")] = 0.20
corr[idx("corridor_pipeline_shock"), idx("rights_or_local_unrest")]  = 0.20

summary, details, outcomes = run_igris_monte_carlo(benin_config, corr, months=12, trials=20000, seed=7)

benin_carver = {
    "northern_complex_attack": {"C":5,"A":3,"R":2,"V":4,"E":5,"Rz":5},
    "IED_or_kidnap_event":     {"C":4,"A":3,"R":3,"V":3,"E":4,"Rz":5},
    "corridor_pipeline_shock": {"C":4,"A":3,"R":3,"V":3,"E":4,"Rz":4},
    "maritime_anchor_incident":{"C":3,"A":2,"R":4,"V":2,"E":3,"Rz":3},
    "rights_or_local_unrest":  {"C":3,"A":3,"R":3,"V":3,"E":3,"Rz":4}
}
scores = carver_weighted_scores(outcomes, benin_carver, risk_names=list(benin_config.keys()))
score_summary = {
    "mean_score": float(np.mean(scores)),
    "p90_score":  float(np.quantile(scores, 0.90)),
    "p95_score":  float(np.quantile(scores, 0.95)),
    "p99_score":  float(np.quantile(scores, 0.99))
}
print("=== IGRIS Monte Carlo (Benin demo) ===")
print("Scenario probabilities:", summary)
print("CARVER-weighted severity (annual):", score_summary)
print("\nRisk config & tags:\n", details)

The engine uses a Gaussian copula via Cholesky decomposition — no scipy dependency. Drop into any Python 3 environment with NumPy and Pandas. Replace benin_config and the correlation matrix with your country's parameters to run a live IGRIS assessment.

"IGRIS doesn't eliminate uncertainty — it quantifies it."
M. Nuri Shakoor, SRMP — Quanta Analytica MNS Consulting

Deploy IGRIS™

Boards · GSOCs · Policy councils

IGRIS™ is deployed through MNS Consulting engagements — scoped to your organization's specific theaters, risk profile, and decision tempo. Whether you need a single-country CARVER + Monte Carlo cut or a full multi-theater living risk intelligence system, the starting point is an advisory intake.

Start Advisory Intake Full QA Process™ QA-CSRF™ Framework Quanta Analytica Home

IGRIS™, SATCON-X, CARVER-ECO, and the IGRIS Monte Carlo Engine are proprietary methodologies of MNS Consulting. Developed in partnership with Lladner Business Solutions, Risk Management & GSOC Services Division. M. Nuri Shakoor, SRMP. All rights reserved.